Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 14:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:
Subject: student loans
To: greg@creditaccuracy.com
student loans is reporting inaccuracies on my credit report. They reported that i was eight times ninety days late. This is false I was in deferment and i have the paperwork to support it. Kheaa, student loan, has been very uncooperative and refuse to correct the inaccuracies. Because of this I have been denied housing.
That sounds like an open-and-shut case-- albeit with some work on your part necessary.
What was the reaction of the credit reporting agencies when you presented the evidence?
they stated that they would reinvestigate, but my wife and i really need to get some quick results. We are trying to buy a house.
Why doesn't your mortgage company use "rapid re-score"?
the mortage company stated that rapid rescore does not guarantee a score improvement.
I'm sorry, I thought you were asking for advice. I gave you the answer to your problem, but you did nothing. If the student loan is the only problem, then you have nothing but your contrariness to finger as the reason you "have been denied housing."
i don't need your unprofessionalism. so thanks for NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wrong, again. It's better described as political incorrectness, though. I'm not a professional: Anybody can throw up a web site and have pointless dialogue with ingrate strangers. Then, again, maybe you're right. Maybe I should call myself an "expert." Yeah, Expert Credit Guru Master Mind Professional. Big Shot Luminary. Venerable Wise Wiseacre. The Wiz 'o the Biz.
I knew how to fix your credit
As soon as you said it
But then when you read it
You didn't get it
Hell, I don't get it
But I won't sweat it. Besides, do you really think anybody's going to read this site over those of other consumer advocates if I just rattle off the usual prattle?
Anyway, you're wrong; you need it.
What's your next move? What's that crack mortgage company telling you to do now?
Have your report changed so the score changes and get the house (or get denied again and find out what's really wrong with your application). Stop wasting time: Mine, yours, and the readers-- they want to know what happens. Stop whining and get on with it.
Next contestant.
Subject: Equifax Canada Inc
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:57:38 EST
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Dear Sir;
We are trying to secure a credit report on ourselves. We live in Canada. We were given an address for Equifax Canada Inc, and have tried to find them on the web. We have found the sight where we can click for a free report but the request forms only accommodate U.S. addresses.
Could you please provide me with an web address where we may apply for the credit report from Equifax Canada Inc?
Thank you,
xxxx xxxx,
Smithville, Ont.
Subject: Re: Equifax Canada Inc
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 16:52:29 -0500
From: Greg Fisher
To: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
http://www.equifax.com/EFX_Canada/consumer_information_centre/ownreport_e.html
http://www.equifax.com/EFX_Canada/consumer_information_centre/docs/Request_Report_Form_e.pdf
http://www.cbs.gov.on.ca/mcbs/english/56VMM5.htm
http://www.cbs.gov.on.ca/mcbs/english/245e_3ea.htm
Subject: Credit scoring
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:23:12 -0400
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
I was sufing the internet in search of the very same question you are asking how do I improve my credit score. I was told you could go to www.myfico.com and pay a fee to get some advice. However, I totaly agree that its unfair to keep this number a mystery. Your credit score keeps you from obtaining things like a house or a car. Anyways, I was really impressed by the amount of time you spent contacting the people at Equifax and that you posted all that information on the internet. Thanks for looking out for the people.
Subject: credit question
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:29:59 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Hi Mr. Fisher,
I read about you in an article on AOL, "7 steps to fixing your credit report".
Can you clarify something for me or refer me to someone that can?
I filed for bankruptcy in 1993, it was discharged in 1994. At that time I was told that current law said bankruptcies would be removed from my credit report in 7 years. I understand that today they stay on for 10 years. It has been over 7 years, can I get it removed from my report? or do I have to wait 10 years?
Thanks for your time!
Subject: Re: credit question
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 06:49:26 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
In 1992, in a document entitled "Facts For Consumers, Solving Credit Problems," the FTC stated that "Credit bureaus are
permitted by law to report bankruptcies for 10 years and other negative information for 7 years."
Subject: Re: credit question
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:36:30 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Thanks so much for responding to my inquiry. Your info was quite helpful.
Subject: a credit problem
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 22:28:45 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Hello, Mr. Fisher,
I am writing to you because I have a credit report problem well my wife has a problem which in turn makes it mine as well. You see in 1998 my wife [wife] was pregnant with our son, he was not due till May of 99 but she had difficultities with the pregnancy and her water broke in December of 98 and was put on bed rest and unable to work. our son [son] was born Jan of 99 instead on May. We were not married at this time and I was still in college. When she bought her [manufacturer] [model] she opted to pay extra each month for disability insurance through the dealer that would cover her car payments in the event that she was unable to work and therefore make the car payments. However, the people at the dealership some how filed the paper work incorrectly and therefore did not cover her payments while she was on bedrest and eventually causing the car to be repossesed. I took out a loan in able to get the car back and the account current. After months and months the paper work was straightened out and we recieved money back but the repossession still remains on her credit report. We have contacted the dealership and I believe [wife] has spoken to someone at the credit bureau and they said that all we could do is send a letter to them stateing why the repossession happened and that would go with the credit report but, we could not get it removed. I also talked to one lawyer who also that there was nothing he could do. So my question to you is, is there anything we can do to get the repossession off of her credit reort? Any help or information you could give us would be of great help Thank You.
xxxx & [wife].
Subject: Re: a credit problem
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 23:27:03 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: xxxx@xxxx.com
Does she have documentation that proves that she had the disability insurance before the convalescence?
Subject: Re: a credit problem
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:19:09 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Hello sir. Yes, I do have dcumentation stating that I had the disability insurance since purchasing the car. (before everything happened.) Problem was the insurance rejected my claim stating that I didn't have it. I fought with them awhile knowing that I did. When I was able to, I went to [manufacturer] (where car was purchased) and a woman helped me. She found my paperwork and determined that I did indeed have it. She then talked to the insurance and it was later discovered that they had filed it under my cosigners name. [manufacturer] blamed underwriters insurance and underwriters blamed [manufacturer]. Is there anything we can do?
Thank you for your assistance!
Subject: Re: a credit problem
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 06:35:36 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
Wide exposure of your situation will resolve it.
If you submit the loan documents and the reports of your credit files to me for publication on creditaccuracy.com, I will document and publish the results of your and my requests to the lender and credit reporting agency to make the correction. You and your spouse will be anonymous (unless you decide otherwise)-- and your account numbers, Social Security numbers and other identifying information unknown to the public. I will scan the reports, remove everything other than the account in question, make the account number unreadable, publish only that account's history, and contact the lender and CRA for their response. I will, however, give the lender and CRA your identifying information.
I will charge you nothing and will provide you with envelopes and postage for our correspndence. I'm happy to discuss this with you on the telephone so you're more comfortable with me. This is a journalistic endeavor, not credit repair.
Will you cooperate?
937-520-0560
Subject: Please Help
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 01:39:36 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
I was just denied a visa platinum by [yyyy]. They said that TransUnion issued them information stating that my "RDC" was 100%. The bank then told me that the RDC was my debt to income ratio. That is completely inaccurate, and is not supported in any way on my credit report. PLEASE, PLEASE explain to me what TransUnions "RDC" is, and what I can do. Thank you so much.
Thank you
Subject: Re: Please Help
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 02:14:25 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
I don't know what "RDC" is, but the credit reporting agencies don't have your income, so their calculating that ratio would be impossible.
Do you have the denial in writing? What, exactly, does it say? What is your Trans Union FICO score and the four reasons
given that it is not higher?
Subject: Re: Please Help
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 02:38:03 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Thank you very much for responding so quickly. I feel as though I am involved in some type of discrimination regarding my application. I am 33 years of age. I have worked at the same job for 3 3/4 years. I have not moved in 4 years. I have a total of 3 inquiries on my report. I rent, make 80k per year. My credit report shows the following: one car loan paid in full, paid off in 1997, was late twice. One visa card (gold) opened 14 months ago, never late/perfect standing. One tax lien, $1300, paid in full in 1996.
I applied for a visa card through [yyyy]. The next day I called to verify approval. I requested an initial $5k limit (they asked me what amount). I was told that I was declined. I asked why. The bank stated they did not know. I asked to be transferred to hisadvisor. The lady got on the phone in the accounts department and stated that they received my TransUnion info and that my"RDC" was listed at 100%. I asked what "RDC" was and she stated debt to income ratio. I said that was impossible, that my debt to income ratio was extremely low. I told her that I actually had my report in from of me (which I did) and began reading it off (its short). She reiterated this mysterious "RDC" thing. I then hung up, and went online. Couldn't find anything anywhere about this "RDC." I then called back, and the office was closed. How is it possible that I have this income, only one account open in perfect standing, be at the same residence and job for 4 years, and not get the visa platinum. She even said that if not approved for the platinum, I was automatically submitted for a regular visa and I was turned down. How is this possible? Something must be wrong. ANY ideas?
Thank you very much for your help.
Subject: Re: Please Help
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 03:08:24 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: xxxx.xxxx.xxx
Get their denial in writing.
See your rights in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
In summarizing the ECOA, the Federal Trade Commission states, "The creditor must give you a notice that tells you either the specific reasons for your rejection or your right to learn the reasons if you ask within 60 days."
They continue, "Unacceptable reasons are: 'You didn’t meet our minimum standards,' or 'You didn’t receive enough points on our credit-scoring system'... Indefinite and vague reasons are illegal, so ask the creditor to be specific."
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/ecoa.htm
If the evidence shows irregularity, I would like to write about your case. There is no charge and you will remain anonymous. Will you cooperate?
Are you in Colorado?
Subject: Re: Please Help.........UPDATE
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 21:23:24 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
I contacted [yyyy] today, and they stated that because I had only one account opened on my TransUnion account, it was being reported maxed out. Every month I have paid my [zzzz] account in full, and I decided to almost max it one month, and carry a balance one month. As a result, [zzzz] gave me a Platinum card. It appears that in turn [zzzz] reported the card to TransUnion as maxed, and in turn TransUnion forwarded the info.to [yyyy] as such. [yyyy] stated to me that there info. from TransUnion states that I am maxed, according to my credit number, etc., they sent to [yyyy].
So, as it stands, although I have now paid off the [zzzz] account in full once again, [yyyy] says they will not issue me a card. They said to try again in the future. I am pissed. Not only did I not receive ANY card from [yyyy], but now I have an inquiry. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE? I live in California by the way.
Thank you
Subject: Re: Please Help.........UPDATE
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 01:11:36 -0400
From: Greg Fisher
To: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
In what month did you borrow the maximum? In what month did you pay it off?
Subject: Re: Please Help.........UPDATE
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 00:56:18 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
LAST MONTH
Subject: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 15:01:55 -0700
From: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
To: hlewis@Bankrate.com
CC: gfisher@erinet.com
Mr. Lewis,
I'm writing regarding your article "7 steps to fixing your credit report," published at http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/cc/20010906a.asp?prodtype=cc
1) I object to this statement, supposedly by Greg Fisher:
"Apply for a mortgage, even if you don't intend to get one. Lenders can get records corrected faster than consumers can, Fisher says, so get a mortgage lender to push for corrections to your credit record, then cancel your application."
I was a mortgage broker for several years. One of the reasons why I quit was that some people did EXACTLY what Greg is recommending:
I fixed their credit, and then they did NOT get a loan -- I did NOT get paid!
Sometimes I'd work over 50 hours with no pay. As a mortgage broker, I was prohibited by law from charging for my services unless the loan CLOSED.
And of course, every time I discussed with other brokers the lack of ETHICS in the mortgage business, the low quoting, the often despicable practices by many brokers, they had a long story to tell me. A story about some borrower who did exactly what Greg proposes, costing the broker often THOUSANDS of dollars in time wasted. So that's what justifies their low quoting and lies.
I realize that you are just the reporter, but I thought I'd bring that to your attention.
2) I am wondering why there is no contact info for Denise Richardson.
I'll appreciate your response, I'm hoping there was a misunderstanding in the interview with Greg Fisher.
Sincerely
Christine Baker
www.bayhouse.com
c: posted at http://www.bayhouse.com/credit-forum/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&threadid=102
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:05:46 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
CC: hlewis@Bankrate.com
What law prohibits lenders from charging for credit repair services?
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:43:32 -0700
From: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
To: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
Greg, the California department of real estate and I also believe federal law - I could ONLY charge the fees I paid for appraisal and report to OTHERS. If I could have charged for my services, I'd probably still be in the mortgage business.
I think it's the credco site that states that there are additional fees for rescoring and those corrections, and they specifically state that those costs may NOT be charged to the borrower as per the FCRA. I disagree - but that's what THEY say.
Christine
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 06:55:42 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
CC: Holden Lewis (hlewis@bankrate.com)
Specifically, what words and in what sections of these laws and regulations-- or any others-- prohibit lenders from charging for credit repair services?
http://www.dre.ca.gov/regscomm.htm
http://www.dca.ca.gov/legal/cr-9.html
http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/croa/croa.htm
http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcrajump.htm
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:39:42 -0700
From: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
To: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
Why don't you just call the DRE?
Subject: http://www.credco.com/HTML%20files/brochures/Rapid%20Recheck/Ra pid_Recheck.htm
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:48:35 -0700
From: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
To: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
The broker can't even get reimbursement for the expenses.
"For FCRA compliance and legal reasons, consumers may not be billed for this service. The charges to the lender are for handling and expedited service."
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:46:10 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
CC: Holden Lewis (hlewis@bankrate.com)
The California Department of Real Estate referred me to the California Code of Regulations, Title 10, Chapter 6, Article 16, §2843:
"No fee may be charged to a borrower as part of the costs and expenses of making the loan which exceeds the fee customarily charged for the same or comparable service in the community where the service was rendered."
If the lender is performing the services outside the preparation of a loan, then the lender is acting as a credit services organization and is subject to the rules of the Credit Services Act in the California Civil Code.
Lenders in California may charge reasonable fees for providing credit repair services, and they don't have to wait for a loan to close.
http://www.calregs.com/
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/civ/1789.10-1789.26.html
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:41:49 -0700
From: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
To: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
"If the lender is performing the services outside the preparation of a loan, then the lender is acting as a credit services organization and is subject to the rules of the Credit Services Act in the California Civil Code.
Lenders in California may charge reasonable fees for providing credit repair services, and they don't have to wait for a loan to close."
Great, what's the URL for those quotes? This is great timing, I was just looking into brokering loans again.
From http://credco.com/HTML%20files/brochures/Rapid%20Recheck/Rapid_Recheck.htm :
"For FCRA compliance and legal reasons, consumers may not be billed for this service. The charges to the lender are for handling and expedited service."
Could you have them take that off, please? I'm sure that when a broker can charge for the credit repair services, he can also charge for the fees for the scores.
What's with that? http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/civ/1789.10-1789.26.html
??????????????????
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:55:28 -0400
From: Greg Fisher
To: Christine Baker
CC: Holden Lewis
Lenders in California may charge reasonable fees for providing credit repair services, and it is not required that a loan close for them to collect a fee. The costs the organization incurs for any type of service to correct a consumer's file are costs of operation-- the same as the cost of postage, telephone service, electricity, office space and complimentary coffee. As long as the fee to the consumer is reasonable, the organization may charge it and pay for its costs from the fee.
I cited the applicable law, the "Credit Services Act of 1984" (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/civ/1789.10-1789.26.html), regulation, the California Code of Regulations, Title 10, Chapter 6, Article 16, §2843 (you can find it at http://www.dre.ca.gov/regscomm2.htm#16), and the California Department of Consumer Affairs' comment on the law (http://www.dca.ca.gov/legal/cr-9.html ).
There isn't any URL for the quote you gave; the words are mine, and are the result of this exchange of email and my conversation with the California Department of Real Estate. If you want a URL, then create one by posting this entire exchange on your message board in the appropriate thread.
Let's say that you say that there's a law prohibiting wearing green hats. I can say that's not true, and you can say that you want me to prove it. If I can't find anything in the laws specifically mentioning green hats, then there is no quote to provide. When I asked you to cite the law to which you were referring, you gave vague references: "the California department of real estate and I also believe federal law." What are the URLs for those references? What are the specific words?
I'm not going to have Credco take anything off anything. They neither write the laws, nor regulate lending or credit services in California.
It is unfortunate for the consumer that credit services organizations have to exist. But, laws that would prohibit their existence-- or not exempting lenders from the requirements placed upon CSOs-- would be even more unfortunate. Lenders in California may charge reasonable fees for providing credit repair services, and they don't have to wait for a loan to close.
Subject: Send me that link
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:21:25 -0700
From: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
To: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
Greg,
Since you have several web sites, I say YOU post your conclusions, YOU put your money where your mouth is, and you offer to pay for any damages loan brokers suffer SHOULD it turn out that you're wrong.
I.e., a complaint is filed against a credit repairing broker and he needs to defend himself, you defend him, pay for the lawyer, and you pick up the resulting losses if the license is suspended or revoked.
I don't have URLs to give you, I've only been in business for a number of years in the 90s, I've been audited and I remember what they told me and I attended the CAMB meetings and followed their advice.
Oh, I nearly forgot, I got put out of business when the TRW revoked my ability to get a credit report FOREVER.
I'm not going to have Credco take anything off anything. They neither write the laws, nor regulate lending or credit services in California.
Really? Putting a broker out of business forever could get rather pricy, but, it's YOUR money!
So, send me that link! I'd like to see a LIST of brokers who will do credit repair,
Christine
Subject: Re: 7 steps to fixing your credit report
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:27:27 -0400
From: Greg Fisher (gfisher@erinet.com)
To: Christine Baker (admin@bayhouse.com)
CC: Holden Lewis (hlewis@bankrate.com)
I won't provide a list of lenders providing credit repair for a fee for you because I don't have the time, I have little interest, nor do I know that any exist (if they are successful at lending, it would only be a sideline). Nor is it, more importantly, germane to the discussion. Nor is your access to credit data being denied. Nor is the alleged advice of a mere trade organization regarding the law and regulation. However, if your point is that there are no lenders providing credit repair for fees, it may be true.
But it isn't illegal.
You suggested that I contact (the legitimate and ultimate authority) the Department of Real Estate, created by the legislature elected by the people, I obliged, and you still do not accept the explanation. There seems to be no end to the hoops through which I'm to jump.
I have two web sites which deal with the credit industry, not several. I'll, indeed, post my conclusions in the form of this exchange. You'll find it with all the other mail at http://creditaccuracy.com/mail.htm. Your readers may see it-- and your not publishing my response to your original public statement about me-- as amusing, given your quote of Solzehnitsyn: "In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us... " That is not to say that your comments are of much note; there are only 82 views of that thread.
I'm not in the bonding business. If a lender doesn't violate the law, and they provide a legitimate service to the consumer at a reasonable price, then they have nothing to worry about and should ignore fear mongering.
My original question remains and hangs heavy in the air: What law prohibits lenders from charging for credit repair services? Please, be specific.
Subject: Credit reporting issues
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: xxxx@xxxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Hi I read the article in bankrate.com and wanted to ask you what you thought I should do in my
situation.
About 12 months ago I ran into some credit issues, 2 of my cards, a Chase Manhattan, and a
Discover card ran late.. I believe the chase ran 1 time past 30 days, and the discover ran 2
times past 30 days.
This obviously is impacting my credit score.
Since 12 months ago, I got a long overdue raise (25%), and have no debt. I would've thought I
could ascertain credit but the two deliquencies are killing me. I have paid off the chase card to
0, and since closed the account. The Discover remains open, but so does their negative comments.
I would like to get these removed so my score leaps up. What do you suggest? There is no
question that I was late, but lets face the facts it was a one time issue, and the fact that there
is no debt now proves it. I do not want this on me for 7 years.
Thanks for your help,
xxxx xxxx
Subject: Re: Credit reporting issues
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 01:08:51 -0400
From: Greg Fisher
To: xxxx@xxxx
I've got enough on my hands merely trying to get all the information contained in my file-- let alone how to cook up a bogus report. What are the most significant four reasons your score (see
http://www.myfico.com/MyFICO/CreditCentral/ScoreInterpreting.htm) is not higher?
Subject: Re: Credit reporting issues
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: xxxx@xxxx
To: Greg Fisher
the top 4 were the deliquencies, the deliquencies again (worded differently in the verbage) and
recent credit inquiries. no 4th was given. I understand my score and how it is impacted, but I'd
like to find out what the best approach is to get this resolved. I wouldn't say this is bogus, but
more fair.. yes I was late, yes the creditors reported it, yes the balance is now 0, yes lets
update the credit back to the agency to normal.. or paid as agreed.
I appreciate the time, it would help me greatly..
Warmest Regards,
xxxx xxxx
Subject: Re: Credit reporting issues
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:09:31 -0400
From: Greg Fisher
To: xxxx@xxxx
Slough off yesterday and move on to tomorrow.
You're going to drive yourself crazy with manic action to trick the credit reporting agency and the
subsequent fear that any accurate negative information removed may return.
What's your score and how did you obtain it? Is it a broad-based risk FICO? What is your goal
(besides a higher score)? Are you trying to buy a house or a car, or are you trying to get a credit
card? What's up with all the inquiries?
Subject: (no subject)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 04:57:00 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Dear Fisher,
I'm not sure if you were looking for this type of e-mail but, I thought
that it was worth a try.
I have heard that I should be able to receive a free copy of my credit
report once a year. Is this true? If so, how do I go about getting one and
from whom do I get it?
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 01:49:21 -0400
From: Greg Fisher
To: xxxx@xxxx
It depends on your state; some are real cheapskates. Heck, I'd give the credit reporting agencies more money if they
could just get it right. See the links at http://creditaccuracy.com/#obtaining.
Subject: Credit Status
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:23:57 EDT
From: xxxx@xxxx.xxx
To: gfisher@erinet.com
Dear Greg:
Hello Greg my name is xxxx xxxx and I have a story to tell.
Back in 1992 my wife and I experienced a devastating blow to my career. I got
caught up in a Corporate downsizing and was let go. We at that time were a
single family income with a house with a Mortgage and young children. The
bill's of course began to pile up, a bad investment and scampering for work
became overwhelming. Greg believe me I lay no blame on my circumstance other
than myself. Both my wife and myself strongly considered Bankruptcy but in
our hearts we just could not do that to whomever we were indebted to, I
believe knowing what I know now we were nieve.
Greg at that time we had a first and second mortgage with Universal Mortgage and G.E. Capitol, both of which
began Foreclosure Filings. We placed the house on the market for sale and
through quite an ordeal got the house sold before the foreclosure. At closing
we had to lay out almost 10,000.00 dollars in attorneys fee's for
foreclosure's that never occurred and our credit went right in the toilet.
Believe it or not, I have had nightmare's about what my family went through.
We have been living in my Father in laws home ever since and paying our own
way. My wife and I have embarked on new careers and are doing OK now. We have
a few credit cards, we lease two vehicles and are making all of our payments.
My concern here is that we would love to be able to buy a house but with
Foreclosure on our credit report I am extremely concerned about qualifying
for a Mortgage. Neither of the two banks or the reporting agencies were
willing to remove the Foreclosure status. Do I stand a chance?
Greg today I am selling automobiles for a living and I am amazed at the amount of people who have claimed bankruptcy, and who demand the best rates available and sometimes get there way. I feel I made a huge
mistake not doing so when we were about to loose everything, and our morals
stood in the way.
Thanks for the ear Greg I feel a little better just
writing this.
Best Regards,
xxxx xxxx
Subject: Re: Credit Status
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 08:41:51 -0400
From: Greg Fisher, gfisher@erinet.com
To: xxxx xxxx
"A borrower whose previous residence or other real property was foreclosed on or has given a deed-in-lieu of
foreclosure within the previous three years is generally not eligible for an insured mortgage."
-- HUD Directive 4155.1, "Mortgage Credit Analysis for Mortgage Insurance on One-to-Four-Family Properties,"
"CHAPTER 2: MORTGAGE CREDIT ANALYSIS."
http://www.hudclips.org/sub_nonhud/cgi/hudclips.cgi
So, even someone with a completed foreclosure is eligible after three years. Apply for a loan this week.
|
|
|